← Search

Doug Conboy

Rathdrum, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
148 matches · 92W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Doug Conboy to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history148 matches
L
2026-08-16 · EW-Peak-Cattell · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Angie Stilson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-16 · EW-Peak-Cattell · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Angie Stilson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-15 · EW-Peak-Cattell · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Angie Stilson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-14 · EW-Peak-Cattell · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Angie Stilson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with James Degrasse championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Kevin Tweed championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Richard Lozano championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-16 · PFC-Anderson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kevin Tweed
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-16 · PFC-Anderson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Jackson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-05-15 · PFC-Anderson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Cattell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-15 · PFC-Anderson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Cattell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
Craig Hart / Zane Schafer
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · with John Cattell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams22 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
61.7%
37W–23L · 55.7% of games
4.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.0
92.6%
25W–2L · 64.7% of games
9.0
40%
2W–3L · 47.4% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 36.2% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 35% of the time
#2 Doubles
35%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
30%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
36 matches
#2 Singles
7%
10 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal