Search

Kevin Tweed

Coeur D Alene, ID
4.0C year-end 2025
134 matches · 78W–56L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.62
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 20 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
7%
down to 3.5
93%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 5% down · 95% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.63. Higher than today’s 3.62 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Teams58 teams · 2002–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kevin has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 6 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.5201920222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Kevin has gone from the 41st to the 39th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
63.4%
26W–15L · 54% of games
4.5
28.6%
2W–5L · 36.7% of games
8.0
69%
20W–9L · 58.3% of games
9.0
0%
0W–7L · 28.7% of games
9.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history134 matches
L
2026-06-26 · PFC-Anderson · #1 Doubles · with Doug Conboy
0.047below expectation — took 0% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 1-0
L
Edward Kim / Scott Dowson
2026-05-16 · PFC-Anderson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Doug Conboy
0.090below expectation — took 20% of games against 62% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Ryan Jensen / Rahul Sharma
2026-05-16 · PFC-Anderson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Cattell
0.006about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
Nate Fulton / Dan Plath
2026-05-15 · PFC-Anderson · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with John Williams
0.015below expectation — took 41% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 6-4
L
Adam Hrebeniuk / William Best
2026-05-15 · PFC-Anderson · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Jackson
0.014about as expected — took 56% of games against 58% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Jason Ladum / Carl Warringchamps
2026-04-19 · PFC-Anderson · #2 Doubles · with Mark Jackson
+0.079better than expected — took 100% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 3-0
L
Mark Villegas / Mark Schaakechamps
2026-04-18 · PFC-Anderson · #1 Doubles · with Keith Schmidt
+0.020better than expected — took 45% of games against 38% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W
Jeff Brantner / Anthony Anegon
2026-04-12 · EW-Peak-Qualls · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Jackson
+0.027better than expected — took 63% of games against 50% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
Steven McMurray / Larry Floyd
2026-04-11 · EW-Peak-Qualls · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Qualls
0.007about as expected — took 55% of games against 55% expected
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Wally Morrison / David Elofson
2026-04-10 · EW-Peak-Qualls · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Tim Qualls
+0.019better than expected — took 63% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Wayne Kohan / Derek Peacock
2026-04-10 · EW-Peak-Qualls · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mark Jackson
+0.013better than expected — took 71% of games against 61% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
John Cadagan / Carl Warring
2026-02-07 · PFC-Anderson · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keith Schmidt
+0.037better than expected — took 68% of games against 50% expected
7-5, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.