← Search

John Droege

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 101W–34L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add John Droege to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
L
2026-08-07 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Dave Vinik championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Dave Vinik championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 1-0
L
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Dave Vinik championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Ken Nichols championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-16 · NOR-PTC-Greenberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chris Cheng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-09 · NOR-PTC-Greenberg · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brad Ouderkirk
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-03 · NOR-PTC-Greenberg · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-04-04 · NOR-PTC-Greenberg · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-03-08 · N OR-PTC-Greenberg · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-02-06 · N OR-PTC-Greenberg · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-01-24 · N OR-PTC-Greenberg · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Vincent Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
75.4%
49W–16L · 57.6% of games
4.5
62.5%
5W–3L · 54.7% of games
8.0
88.9%
24W–3L · 62.6% of games
8.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 47.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 30% of the time
#1 Doubles
30%
41 matches
#1 Singles
25%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
18%
24 matches
#2 Singles
18%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova