← Search

Chris Bridgeman

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
52 matches · 23W–29L · seasons 2020–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.56
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
24%
down to 3.5
76%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 14% down · 86% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.59. Higher than today’s 3.56 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
152 of 199
WA · 4.0
684 of 840

Chris is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Chris has been a steady 4.0 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.54.0202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Chris has gone from the 25th to the 21st percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
45.5%
20W–24L · 48.4% of games
8.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history52 matches
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Dan Eder
+0.057better than expected — took 56% of games against 35% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Doug Conboy / Richard Lozanochamps
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Dan Eder
+0.020better than expected — took 53% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Geoff Harrison
−0.025below expectation — took 43% of games against 54% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Vander Stoep
+0.041better than expected — took 67% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Hyeoncheol Jung / Ryan Ham
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rob Vander Stoep
−0.012below expectation — took 43% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
Geoffrey Seuk / Jeff Chaney
2026-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tristan Ogden
−0.007about as expected — took 53% of games against 56% expected
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
William Snedegar / Daniel Song
2026-04-05 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Clay Dudley
−0.039below expectation — took 20% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Bo Ford / Jon Francis
2026-02-22 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brian MacDuff
+0.046better than expected — took 67% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-02-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rick Eberhardt
−0.024below expectation — took 29% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-02-01 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dustin Schmidt
−0.027below expectation — took 14% of games against 35% expected
6-0, 6-2
L
2025-12-07 · #3 Doubles · with Tim Giacometti
−0.016below expectation — took 25% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2025-10-11 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dan Eder
−0.027below expectation — took 57% of games against 65% expected
7-6, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.