← Search

Carl Swanson

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
80 matches · 46W–34L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Carl Swanson to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history80 matches
W
2026-08-08 · STC-Hummel · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Cara Holloway mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-12 · STC-Hummel · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Lauren Hummel mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · with John Ferry championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Cameron Ragen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Cameron Ragen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Cameron Ragen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Cameron Ragen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-06-20 · NWW-STC-Suver · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ashleigh Dickinson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
L
Michelle Chapple / Daniel Gong
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · with Liz Suver championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
L
Michele Drucker / Daniel Halle
2026-03-13 · #2 Doubles · with Dayna Guizzetti championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-01-31 · STC-Young · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-01-03 · STC-Young · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Foster
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
75%
3W–1L · 67.6% of games
5.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 56.5% of games
8.0
83.3%
5W–1L · 62.8% of games
9.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 40% of games
10.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 43% of the time
#1 Doubles
43%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
36%
29 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
17 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert