← Search

Todd Siegel

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
76 matches · 45W–31L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Todd Siegel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history76 matches
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Christopher Haddon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Christopher Haddon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-0
W
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with David Reynoldson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-03-15 · MAC-Austin · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Reynoldson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-02-06 · MAC-Austin · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Reynoldson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-01-24 · MAC-Austin · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nathan Austin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-01-04 · MAC-Austin · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mike Easton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W
2025-11-27 · N OR-MAC-Siegel · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Daniel Larsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2025-11-02 · N OR-MAC-Siegel · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Reynoldson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2025-09-28 · N OR-MAC-Siegel · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Wiley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-13 · N OR-MAC-Siegel · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Reynoldson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2025-08-22 · #3 Doubles · with Greg Masson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
63%
29W–17L · 57.1% of games
9.0
57.1%
4W–3L · 53.3% of games
9.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 53% of the time
#3 Doubles
53%
40 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
26 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
6 matches
#1 Singles
4%
3 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal