← Search

Mike Easton

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
97 matches · 52W–45L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Mike Easton to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history97 matches
W
2026-03-15 · MAC-Austin · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-02-15 · MAC-Austin · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-01-31 · MAC-Austin · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Dirk Koopman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-01-24 · MAC-Austin · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Daniel Larsen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-04 · MAC-Austin · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Todd Siegel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L
2025-11-23 · N OR-MAC-Siegel · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Rodrigo Aguilar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2025-11-16 · N OR-MAC-Siegel · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christopher Haddon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2025-10-03 · N OR-MAC-Siegel · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with David Wiley
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2025-09-28 · N OR-MAC-Siegel · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Christopher Haddon
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2025-08-22 · #2 Doubles · with Bo Johnson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-06-22 · #1 Doubles · with Christopher Haddon championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with David Wiley championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2018–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.5
54.4%
37W–31L · 53% of games
9.0
55%
11W–9L · 50.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 28% of the time
#1 Singles
28%
27 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
26 matches
#2 Singles
21%
20 matches
#2 Doubles
14%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
10%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer