Search

Tim Larson

Mercer Island, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
114 matches · 65W–49L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.16
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
2%
down to 4.0
98%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 4.5
6 of 17
WA · 4.5
122 of 364

Tim is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Tim has played at 4.5, 5.0 across 8 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

4.04.55.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Tim has gone from the 89th to the 82nd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.5
75%
30W–10L · 57.6% of games
5.0
30.4%
7W–16L · 44% of games
9.0
73.3%
11W–4L · 54.2% of games
8.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 46.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history114 matches
L
Jason Hsu / Amy Hsumixed
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with CECI BISSONNETTE
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 48% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Ronald Beresky
0.024below expectation — took 50% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
Todd Siegel / David Reynoldsonchamps
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Robert Matthews
0.033below expectation — took 52% of games against 62% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
Cameron Ragen / Carl Swansonchamps
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Robert Matthews
0.015below expectation — took 47% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 2-6, 1-0
W
Alex Yang / Stephen Yang
2026-06-07 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Matthews
+0.069better than expected — took 92% of games against 54% expected
6-0, 6-1
W
Jonathan Ip / Michael Joung
2026-05-24 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Marco Wen
0.014about as expected — took 72% of games against 70% expected
6-0, 7-5
W
Silas Setterstrom / Jeffrey Stoner
2026-05-09 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Matthews
+0.034better than expected — took 71% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
Ramanuja Atur / Florian Purganan
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Harold Abell
0.001about as expected — took 52% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
Rahul M / Tom Parrishchamps
2026-03-29 · #3 Doubles · with Steven Dagg
0.019below expectation — took 59% of games against 64% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Varun Verma / Christopher Lewis
2026-02-22 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chad Dierickx
0.006about as expected — took 52% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
David Han / Jeffrey Stoner
2026-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Matthews
0.055below expectation — took 33% of games against 59% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-09-28 · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Subeer Manhas
0.039below expectation — took 29% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.