← Search

Robert Matthews

Seattle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
114 matches · 60W–54L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Robert Matthews to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history114 matches
W
2026-09-13 · MI-Matthews · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tim Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with Steven Dagg championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Tim Larson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Tim Larson championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-06-07 · MI-Not That Young-Franklin · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tim Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-31 · MI-Not That Young-Franklin · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Harold Abell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-24 · MI-Not That Young-Franklin · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Curran Hagstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-05-09 · MI-Not That Young-Franklin · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tim Larson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-02 · MI-Not That Young-Franklin · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Harold Abell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-03-27 · #2 Doubles · with Curran Hagstrom championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-15 · NWW-MI-Hagstrom · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Curran Hagstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-14 · NWW-MI-Hagstrom · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Curran Hagstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
70%
21W–9L · 57.6% of games
5.0
34.2%
13W–25L · 47.7% of games
9.0
50%
9W–9L · 52.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
35%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
16 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer