← Search

Ross Laursen

Kirkland, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 79W–44L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Ross Laursen to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history123 matches
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Gregory Skaggs championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Marco Wen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Gregory Skaggs championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · with Gregory Skaggs championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-06-06 · NTC-Fogt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gregory Skaggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-05-10 · NTC-Fogt · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gregory Skaggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · NTC-Fogt · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gregory Skaggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-24 · NTC-Fogt · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Lewis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · NTC-Fogt · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Andrew Ygona
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-11 · NTC-Fogt · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Clifford Flekser
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-15 · NTC-Fogt · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gregory Skaggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-03-14 · NTC-Fogt · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Gregory Skaggs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-5, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
67.3%
35W–17L · 57.3% of games
9.0
87.5%
7W–1L · 60.8% of games
10.0mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 47.7% of games
9.0mixed
43.5%
10W–13L · 50.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 60% of the time
#1 Doubles
60%
74 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
17 matches
#1 Male Singles
3%
4 matches
#1 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe