← Search

Bryan Ward

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
161 matches · 121W–40L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Bryan Ward to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history161 matches
W
2026-07-25 · Ward-Lawn Chair Legends · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Sergio Toledo
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · Ward-Lawn Chair Legends · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bo Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with David Squire championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2026-06-27 · #2 Doubles · with David Squire championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with David Squire championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with David Squire championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · PTC-Borosky · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bo Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-4
W
2026-05-31 · PTC-Borosky · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ry Koteen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-05-16 · PTC-Borosky · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bo Johnson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-25 · PTC-Borosky · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ry Koteen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-04-17 · PTC-Borosky · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ry Koteen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-11 · PTC-Borosky · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ry Koteen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 7-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams58 teams · 2007–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
80.9%
72W–17L · 59.6% of games
5.0
50%
3W–3L · 47% of games
9.0
70.6%
12W–5L · 60.2% of games
9.0mixed
75%
3W–1L · 59.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
44 matches
#1 Singles
11%
18 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
18 matches
#2 Singles
4%
7 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams