PTC-Borosky

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 4.41 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41

Bo Johnson

usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #1 Singles 14% · published 4.5

4.26

Eugene Jung

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5

4.24

Bryan Ward

usually #2 Doubles 73%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 4.5

4.22

Josh Schweitz

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5

4.19

Stewart Bartlett

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5

4.10

Jimmy Shen

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5

4.06

David Vant Hof

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5

4.03

Arthur Kowitch

usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5

4.02

Ry Koteen

usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5

3.87

Byron Carlson

usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 30% · published 4

3.78

Bart Borosky

usually #1 Singles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5

Bo Johnson

49W–18L career

0%84%16%

4.41

4.5

Eugene Jung

112W–35L career

0%97%3%

4.26

4.5

Bryan Ward

36W–15L career

0%99%1%

4.24

4.5

Josh Schweitz

56W–30L career

1%98%1%

4.22

4.5

Stewart Bartlett

29W–24L career · type S

7%87%6%

4.19

4.5

Jimmy Shen

23W–29L career

4%96%0%

4.10

4.5

David Vant Hof

89W–41L career

8%92%0%

4.06

4.5

Arthur Kowitch

66W–33L career

18%81%0%

4.03

4.5

Ry Koteen

49W–49L career

19%80%0%

4.02

Byron Carlson

24W–12L career

0%94%5%

3.87

Bart Borosky

45W–47L career

4%91%5%

3.78

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.