← Search

Curran Hagstrom

Mercer Island, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
85 matches · 58W–27L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.32
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 13 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 4.0
99%
stay 4.5
1%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Mercer Island · 4.5
2 of 17
WA · 4.5
24 of 364

Curran is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Curran has been 4.5 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

4.04.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Curran has gone from the 93rd to the 91st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.5
68.4%
39W–18L · 59.8% of games
5.0
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games
9.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history85 matches
W
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Collin Hagstrom
+0.006better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-05-31 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Fleming
−0.054below expectation — took 33% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
Viraj Desai / Nicholas Aguirre
2026-05-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Matthews
+0.027better than expected — took 80% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Harold Abell
−0.014below expectation — took 44% of games against 50% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
Kevin Tsay / Jared Hill
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joshua Glick
+0.041better than expected — took 92% of games against 64% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-04-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Milt Reimers
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 70% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
Mike Wilson / David Emery-Peckchamps
2026-03-29 · #1 Doubles · with Joshua Glick
−0.036below expectation — took 48% of games against 61% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Winston McClanahan / Vikram Swamychamps
2026-03-27 · #2 Doubles · with Robert Matthews
+0.008better than expected — took 63% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-03-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Matthews
−0.004better than expected — took 80% of games against 71% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-03-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Robert Matthews
+0.011about as expected — took 52% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-03-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joshua Glick
−0.019about as expected — took 75% of games against 73% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-02-22 · #1 Singles · 4.5
−0.001about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.