Teams

MI-Not That Young-Franklin

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Men

17 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2026-06-07vs CP-IyerWon 32
W#1 DoublesCurran Hagstrom / Collin Hagstrom vs Madhur Joshi / Greg Harriman6-3, 6-2
L#1 SinglesChad Dierickx vs ATUL ALATKAR6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJason Kim / Joshua Glick vs Steve McRae / Skanda Iyer6-1, 6-0
L#2 SinglesChris Fahey vs Raymond Lam5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesTim Larson / Robert Matthews vs Alex Yang / Stephen Yang6-0, 6-1
2026-05-31vs AYTC-Sop DeGens-TruongLost 05
L#1 DoublesRobert Matthews / Harold Abell vs Benjamin Bethards / Alexander Calpagiu4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMax Franklin vs Justin Song2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMilt Reimers / Jordan Corey vs Carlos Cardenas / Robert Pendley4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJason Kim vs Oscar Cruz2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesCurran Hagstrom / Michael Fleming vs Darrell Huang / Christopher Truong3-6, 3-6
2026-05-24vs PSC-IpWon 50
W#1 DoublesRobert Matthews / Curran Hagstrom vs Viraj Desai / Nicholas Aguirre6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMax Franklin vs David Fowler6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMarco Wen / Tim Larson vs Jonathan Ip / Michael Joung6-0, 7-5
W#2 SinglesJason Kim vs Michael Qi6-1, 7-5
W#3 DoublesChad Dierickx / Jason Bloom vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-05-17vs AYTC-Del RosarioWon 32
L#1 DoublesCurran Hagstrom / Harold Abell vs Jason Bower / Ryan Johnson6-7, 5-7
W#1 SinglesJason Kim vs Spencer Goll6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMilt Reimers / Joshua Glick vs James Crosetto / Yung Hu7-6, 6-2
W#2 SinglesMichael Fleming vs Daniel Liu7-6, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJason Bloom / Chris Fahey vs John Gallelli / Marco del Rosario3-6, 4-6
2026-05-09vs BC-ChenWon 50
W#1 DoublesCurran Hagstrom / Joshua Glick vs Kevin Tsay / Jared Hill6-1, 6-0
W#1 SinglesMax Franklin vs Issei Komatsu7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesCollin Hagstrom / Jordan Corey vs Sam Varon / Bruno Caiado6-3, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJason Kim vs Daniel Bor6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRobert Matthews / Tim Larson vs Silas Setterstrom / Jeffrey Stoner6-4, 6-1
2026-05-02vs NWW-AYTC-JiLost 23
W#1 DoublesRobert Matthews / Harold Abell vs Percy Pan / Benjamin Liang6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMax Franklin vs Rui Silva0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCollin Hagstrom / Kunal Walia vs Charles Hodge / Andrew Tran6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesJason Kim vs Michael Pu6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMilt Reimers / Jordan Corey vs Ajay Qi / Raven Thio6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-04-26vs TCSP-Growth Mindset-TsengWon 41
W#1 DoublesMilt Reimers / Curran Hagstrom vs Raymond Lim / Steven Ruhoy6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMax Franklin vs Frederick Huyan6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJason Kim / Kunal Walia vs Tyler Gardner / Aaron Miller3-6, 4-6
W#2 SinglesMichael Fleming vs Greg Tseng6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCollin Hagstrom / Chris Fahey vs Rahul M / David Li6-2, 7-6
2026-04-12vs HBSQ-ShalabyWon 32
W#1 DoublesMilt Reimers / Joshua Glick vs Samarth Mehta / Chien Chang6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMax Franklin vs Bryant Pham3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKunal Walia / Steven Masada vs David Drake / Ben Falk3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesHarold Abell vs George Huang6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMarco Wen / Jordan Corey vs Youssef Shalaby / Mark Thorrington6-2, 7-5
2026-04-11vs MC-M 4.5-PurgananWon 41
W#1 DoublesTim Larson / Harold Abell vs Ramanuja Atur / Florian Purganan6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMax Franklin vs Kleanthis Zisis Tegos6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJason Kim / Jordan Corey vs Deepak Venkateswaran / Zachary Chai6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesMichael Fleming vs Rodolfo Baba4-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJoshua Glick / Steven Masada vs Mike Wilson / Andrew Shen6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.21 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Milt Reimers
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.41
Curran Hagstrom
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
4.41
Jason Kim
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
4.34
Max Franklin
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.34
Harold Abell
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 4.5
4.34
Michael Fleming
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.30
Marco Wen
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.27
Jordan Corey
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.25
Chad Dierickx
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 4.5
4.20
Steven Masada
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.16
Collin Hagstrom
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.15
Chris Fahey
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.11
Joshua Glick
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.08
Kunal Walia
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.05
Jason Bloom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Robert Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
3.64
Tim Larson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Curran Hagstrom + Robert Matthews4159% games+11.7% vs expected
Milt Reimers + Chris Fahey6066% games+9.6% vs expected
Milt Reimers + Tim Larson10062% games+9.0% vs expected
Robert Matthews + Tim Larson172050% games+7.3% vs expected
Chris Fahey + Joshua Glick23658% games+6.6% vs expected
Jason Bloom + Kunal Walia2350% games+6.4% vs expected
Milt Reimers + Joshua Glick7259% games+3.9% vs expected
Marco Wen + Milt Reimers4160% games+2.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Milt Reimers
64W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
4.41
4.5
Curran Hagstrom
58W–27L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
4.41
Jason Kim
43W–14L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
4.41
Max Franklin
14W–7L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
4.34
4.5
Harold Abell
16W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
4.34
4.5
Michael Fleming
53W–33L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%89%10%
4.34
4.5
Marco Wen
65W–29L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
4.30
4.5
Jordan Corey
44W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Chad Dierickx
10W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Steven Masada
34W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Collin Hagstrom
50W–44L career · 4 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Chris Fahey
63W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%<1%
4.15
4.5
Joshua Glick
61W–34L career · 5 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
4.11
4.5
Kunal Walia
48W–35L career · 3 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
4.08
4.5
Jason Bloom
25W–17L career · 2 lines in 2026
36%64%<1%
4.05
4.5
Robert Matthews
59W–54L career · 5 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
4.04
4.5
Tim Larson
66W–49L career · 4 lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
3.64

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.