← Search

Michael Fleming

Newcastle, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 53W–33L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Michael Fleming to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
L
2026-05-31 · MI-Not That Young-Franklin · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Curran Hagstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-17 · MI-Not That Young-Franklin · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-04-26 · MI-Not That Young-Franklin · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-04-11 · MI-Not That Young-Franklin · #2 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3
L
2026-03-27 · #3 Doubles · with Harold Abell championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-15 · NWW-MI-Hagstrom · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chad Dierickx
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-03-14 · NWW-MI-Hagstrom · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Chad Dierickx
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · NWW-MI-Condiotty · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Robert Matthews
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-03-07 · NWW-MI-Hagstrom · #1 Singles · 4.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-02-15 · NWW-MI-Condiotty · #1 Singles · 5.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2026-02-07 · NWW-MI-Hagstrom · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Curran Hagstrom
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-01-26 · NWW-MI-Condiotty · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Ken Bang
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
75.6%
34W–11L · 57.1% of games
5.0
30.8%
4W–9L · 40.6% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 55% of the time
#1 Singles
55%
47 matches
#2 Singles
19%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
13%
11 matches
#2 Doubles
8%
7 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal