← Search

Thomas McGirk

Vancouver, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
216 matches · 101W–115L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Thomas McGirk to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history216 matches
L
2026-08-15 · NOR-McGirk · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jack Yothers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-01 · NOR-McGirk · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paul Ezelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-07-14 · NOR-McGirk · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paul Ezelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-11 · NOR-McGirk · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mike Zielinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-27 · #3 Doubles · with Frank Collie championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · #1 Doubles · with Daniel Burns championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-26 · #2 Doubles · with Bill Terry championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · with Bill Terry championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-06-14 · CGM-McGirk · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mike Zielinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · CGM-McGirk · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shaun Wilson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · CGM-McGirk · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mike Zielinski
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · CGM-McGirk · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bryan Endreson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams87 teams · 2001–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.5
51.8%
73W–68L · 51% of games
9.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 42.2% of games
8.0mixed
83.3%
5W–1L · 56.7% of games
9.0mixed
35.7%
10W–18L · 44.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
77 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
62 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
45 matches
#1 Singles
9%
20 matches
#2 Singles
6%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe