Search

Thomas McGirk

Vancouver, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
129 matches · 56W–73L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.94
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 31 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
78%
down to 4.0
22%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 52% down · 48% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.00. Higher than today’s 3.94 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Vancouver · 4.5
8 of 12
WA · 4.5
297 of 364

Thomas is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams86 teams · 2001–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Thomas has been a steady 4.5 across all 5 seasons on record.

4.04.520192020202120222026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Thomas has gone from the 39th to the 29th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
4.5
50%
43W–43L · 50.3% of games
9.0
28.6%
2W–5L · 42.8% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
35.3%
6W–11L · 44.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history129 matches
L
Matt Fanelli / Kyle Kinderknecht
2026-07-14 · McGirk · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Paul Ezelle
0.014below expectation — took 40% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
Danh Nguyen / Mingyang Liu
2026-07-11 · McGirk · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mike Zielinski
+0.062better than expected — took 63% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
David Meacham / Todd Battisonchamps
2026-06-27 · CGM-McGirk · #3 Doubles · with Frank Collie
+0.006about as expected — took 50% of games against 49% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-27 · CGM-McGirk · #1 Doubles · with Daniel Burns
0.009below expectation — took 20% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
David Robin / Rob Knoxchamps
2026-06-26 · CGM-McGirk · #2 Doubles · with Bill Terry
+0.034better than expected — took 72% of games against 54% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-06-26 · CGM-McGirk · #3 Doubles · with Bill Terry
+0.004about as expected — took 35% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
Hector M Salomon / Brian Wicklund
2026-06-14 · CGM-McGirk · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mike Zielinski
+0.002about as expected — took 59% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-13 · CGM-McGirk · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shaun Wilson
0.012below expectation — took 44% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-30 · CGM-McGirk · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mike Zielinski
0.012about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-17 · CGM-McGirk · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Bryan Endreson
0.028below expectation — took 43% of games against 55% expected
4-3
L
Tyrese Toomey / Lake Ihly
2026-05-02 · CGM-McGirk · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mike Zielinski
0.015below expectation — took 35% of games against 44% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Kyle Kinderknecht / Juan Presichi
2026-04-26 · CGM-McGirk · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mark Appleby
0.030below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.