← Search

Son Huynh

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
130 matches · 98W–32L · seasons 2020–2027

Captains: add Son Huynh to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history130 matches
L
2026-09-12 · LOTC-Wong · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Allison Ko mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
L
Corey DeLeonard / Scott Andersen
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Ben Natinsky championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-10 · #3 Doubles · with Alena Lauritsen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Bradley Sumoge championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Nathan Mouchard / Brent Grubb
2026-06-14 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexander Calpagiu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-06-13 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jason Qian
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-24 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with WILLIAM EDWARDS
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-08 · LOTC-Keomanivanh/Rubinshteyn · #1 Male Singles · 8.0 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-6
L
2026-02-27 · LOTC-Keomanivanh/Rubinshteyn · #1 Male Doubles · 8.0 · with Jaime Perez mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-6
W
2026-02-08 · LOTC-Keomanivanh/Rubinshteyn · #1 Male Singles · 8.0 mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0
L
2025-12-14 · #3 Doubles · with Sarah Ferrer championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-12-14 · #2 Doubles · with Alena Lauritsen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
68%
17W–8L · 60.6% of games
4.5
86.7%
13W–2L · 58.3% of games
10.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
90.9%
10W–1L · 68.8% of games
8.0mixed
67.9%
19W–9L · 61.9% of games
9.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 62.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 39% of the time
#2 Doubles
39%
51 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
43 matches
#3 Doubles
22%
29 matches
#1 Male Doubles
2%
3 matches
#1 Male Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal