← Search

WILLIAM EDWARDS

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
68 matches · 37W–31L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add WILLIAM EDWARDS to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history68 matches
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with Atom Fjeldsted championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ben Natinsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-06-13 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Ben Natinsky
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-0
L
2026-05-24 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Son Huynh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L
Lake Ihly / Joel Garcia
2026-04-19 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Atom Fjeldsted
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-11-01 · N OR-WHRC-Mam · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Emily Barretta mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-19 · N OR-WHRC-Mam · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Audrey Thompson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2025-09-07 · N OR-WHRC-Mam · #3 Doubles · 10.0 · with Audrey Thompson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 0-6
W
2025-08-08 · #1 Doubles · with Mark Chen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
L
2025-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Brendan Gibbons championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-5, 0-1
L
2025-06-29 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2025-06-28 · #2 Doubles · with Ben Natinsky championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.5
77.8%
21W–6L · 58.2% of games
5.0
33.3%
2W–4L · 41.1% of games
0.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
10.0mixed
18.2%
2W–9L · 35.4% of games
9.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 51.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
21 matches
#3 Doubles
13%
9 matches
#1 Male Doubles
7%
5 matches
#1 Male Singles
4%
3 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
3%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal