Search

Carson Hall

Portland, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
65 matches · 34W–31L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.13
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
6%
down to 4.0
94%
stay 4.5
0%
up to 5.0

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.5
47 of 119
OR · 4.5
92 of 226

Carson is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Carson has been 4.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

4.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Carson has gone from the 60th to the 40th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2024.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.5
56.1%
23W–18L · 51.5% of games
8.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 45.5% of games
9.0mixed
53.8%
7W–6L · 49.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history65 matches
L
Ben Natinsky / WILLIAM EDWARDS
2026-06-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jordan Burns
0.011below expectation — took 32% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 6-0
W
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Bard
0.005better than expected — took 80% of games against 71% expected
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-04-18 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jordan Burns
0.022about as expected — took 71% of games against 71% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Alexander Calpagiu / Mark Chen
2026-04-04 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jordan Burns
0.069below expectation — took 25% of games against 58% expected
6-0, 6-4
W
Maddie Karpinski / Pat Soongmixed
2025-11-15 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Annie Duong
+0.000below expectation — took 52% of games against 64% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-26 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Annie Duong
+0.000better than expected — took 68% of games against 51% expected
6-0, 7-6
W
2025-09-13 · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kathryn Wilson
+0.000better than expected — took 63% of games against 39% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Ben Natinsky / WILLIAM EDWARDSchamps
2025-06-28 · #2 Doubles · with Benjamin Yang
0.021below expectation — took 37% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Tyrese Toomey / Ty Harmon
2025-06-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Benjamin Yang
+0.045better than expected — took 86% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2025-05-10 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jimmy Crumpacker
0.028about as expected — took 80% of games against 80% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
Clinton Young / Griffin Calkins
2025-04-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jimmy Crumpacker
+0.018better than expected — took 63% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
Joseph Palodichuk / Nathan Roach
2025-04-13 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Jimmy Crumpacker
+0.069better than expected — took 86% of games against 49% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.