← Search

Jordan Burns

Longview, WA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 49W–50L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jordan Burns to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history99 matches
W
2026-08-16 · NOR-Burns · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Simon Waite
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
W
N/A
2026-08-13 · NOR-Burns · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Toby Krauel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-16 · NOR-Burns · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Simon Waite
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-06-13 · CGM-McGirk · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carson Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-05-30 · CGM-McGirk · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Toby Krauel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-04-18 · CGM-McGirk · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carson Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-04 · CGM-McGirk · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Carson Hall
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-21 · VTC-McGirk/Krauel · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Vant Hof
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-07 · VTC-McGirk/Krauel · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Toby Krauel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-02-22 · VTC-McGirk/Krauel · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Toby Krauel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
N/A
2026-02-01 · VTC-McGirk/Krauel · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Toby Krauel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
Leo Keppinger / Jared Lewis - (DQ)*
2026-01-31 · VTC-McGirk/Krauel · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with David Sturdyvin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
38.9%
7W–11L · 48.7% of games
4.5
52.8%
38W–34L · 52.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 57% of the time
#1 Doubles
57%
56 matches
#2 Doubles
22%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#1 Singles
3%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe