Search

Atom Fjeldsted

Beaverton, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
109 matches · 83W–26L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
4.04.55.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

4.47
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 24 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 4.0
65%
stay 4.5
35%
up to 5.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 91% stay · 9% up, from a year-end estimate of 4.39. Lower than today’s 4.47 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.5 runs from 4.01 to 4.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Beaverton · 4.5
1 of 19
OR · 4.5
4 of 226

Atom is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams33 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Atom has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

3.54.04.52019202020212022202320242026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.5, Atom has gone from the 94th to the 91st percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
4.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 62.3% of games
4.5
78.9%
15W–4L · 59.2% of games
5.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
63.6%
14W–8L · 56.9% of games
9.0mixed
86.7%
13W–2L · 60.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history109 matches
W
Kristin Larson / Mark Schaake - (DQ)champs
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Yuko Hopman
+0.040better than expected — took 75% of games against 53% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Alex Braksator / Carmen Zlateffchamps
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Alyssa Mah
0.049below expectation — took 33% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Andrew Singharaj / Christine Muellerchamps
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Alena Lauritsen
+0.010better than expected — took 86% of games against 70% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Alexander Calpagiu
0.039below expectation — took 62% of games against 72% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Jonathan Haukaas / John Bard
2026-06-13 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Cheng
+0.010better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Ryan Goldsmith / Tim Layman
2026-06-07 · VTC-Nelson · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Elijah Nelson
+0.052better than expected — took 56% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
Eddie Schultz / Ryley Schultz
2026-06-05 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexander Calpagiu
+0.031better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-24 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Simmering
+0.021better than expected — took 68% of games against 56% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
Eric Pickard / Sergio Toledo
2026-05-23 · VTC-Nelson · #2 Doubles · 5.0 · with Elijah Nelson
+0.039better than expected — took 67% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-04-25 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Joshua Goddard
+0.039better than expected — took 60% of games against 43% expected
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
Lake Ihly / Joel Garcia
2026-04-19 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with WILLIAM EDWARDS
0.036below expectation — took 48% of games against 61% expected
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
Andrew Nakajima / Jasper Koenen
2026-03-29 · VTC-Nelson · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Mark Chen
+0.064better than expected — took 38% of games against 19% expected
6-3, 7-5
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.