← Search

Atom Fjeldsted

Beaverton, OR
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
152 matches · 113W–39L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Atom Fjeldsted to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history152 matches
W
2026-09-13 · WHRC-Reutin · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Suzanne Chambers mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Alexander Calpagiu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 4-6
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Doubles · with WILLIAM EDWARDS championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
W
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Alexander Calpagiu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · with Alyssa Mah championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Kristin Larson / Mark Schaake - (DQ)
2026-07-11 · #2 Doubles · with Yuko Hopman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · with Alena Lauritsen championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-21 · #1 Doubles · with Alexander Calpagiu championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-06-13 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Michael Cheng
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-06-07 · VTC-Nelson · #1 Doubles · 5.0 · with Elijah Nelson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-05 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alexander Calpagiu
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-05-24 · NOR-WHRC-Fjeldsted · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Matt Simmering
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams35 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
4.0
85.7%
12W–2L · 62.3% of games
4.5
83.3%
20W–4L · 61.6% of games
5.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 53.8% of games
0.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
75%
24W–8L · 59.6% of games
9.0mixed
69.6%
16W–7L · 57.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 36% of the time
#1 Doubles
36%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
26%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
29 matches
#1 Male Singles
5%
7 matches
#1 Singles
5%
7 matches
#1 Mixed Doubles
3%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal