← Search

Suzanne Chambers

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 82W–68L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Suzanne Chambers to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
W
2026-09-13 · WHRC-Reutin · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Atom Fjeldsted mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-08-09 · Ginnie for the Winnie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danica Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-26 · Ginnie for the Winnie · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danica Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-28 · WHRC-Adcock/Watanabe · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Frank Collie mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · LOTC-Goddard/Rubinshteyn · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-31 · LOTC-Goddard/Rubinshteyn · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Celene Robert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · LOTC-Lee/Kearns · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ginny Nguyen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-05-17 · LOTC-Lee/Kearns · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-04-24 · LOTC-Goddard/Rubinshteyn · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-19 · LOTC-Lee/Kearns · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danira Bilanovic
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-02-15 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-01-31 · WHRC-Lauritsen · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams41 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 50% of games
3.5
72.9%
35W–13L · 57.8% of games
4.0
25%
10W–30L · 41.5% of games
6.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
57.1%
4W–3L · 60.3% of games
8.0mixed
60.9%
14W–9L · 56.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 37% of the time
#1 Singles
37%
55 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
13%
19 matches
#2 Singles
13%
19 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams