Teams

WHRC-Lauritsen

2026 Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.69 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Mckenna Selbak
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 4
3.74
Mary Lowblad
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.72
Sharon Kim-Geib
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.71
Adrienne VanBeckhoven
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.66
Barbara Dusicka
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.60
Seungja Shin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.54
Alena Lauritsen
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.52
Anita Rockwell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.50
Colleen Docktor
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Melissa Smith
usually #1 Singles 63%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.45
Karen Harlow
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.36
Katherine McMillan
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.30
Suzanne Chambers
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Mckenna Selbak
23W–18L career
1%99%0%
3.76
4
Mary Lowblad
123W–61L career
4%95%1%
3.74
4
Sharon Kim-Geib
75W–53L career
1%99%0%
3.72
4
Adrienne VanBeckhoven
39W–22L career
2%98%0%
3.71
3.5
Barbara Dusicka
97W–37L career
0%35%65%
3.66
4
Seungja Shin
86W–64L career
13%87%0%
3.60
3.5
Alena Lauritsen
128W–74L career
0%70%30%
3.54
3.5
Anita Rockwell
124W–51L career
0%74%26%
3.52
3.5
Colleen Docktor
35W–26L career
0%81%19%
3.50
3.5
Melissa Smith
47W–54L career
0%87%13%
3.46
3.5
Karen Harlow
79W–58L career
0%90%10%
3.45
3.5
Katherine McMillan
49W–14L career
1%90%9%
3.36
3.5
Suzanne Chambers
80W–68L career
0%98%1%
3.30

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.