← Search

Timothea Barnatan

Portland, OR
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
215 matches · 96W–119L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Timothea Barnatan to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history215 matches
L
2026-09-13 · SAC-Valiyaparambil · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Shubhan Patankar mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-09-13 · SAC-Boyce · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jill Boyce
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-12 · SAC-Boyce · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Vivek Mano mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-07-10 · SAC-Boyce · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Matt Zhou mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-06-14 · SAC-Gatzke · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jamie Heberlein
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-07 · SAC-Gatzke · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Gatzke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-06-06 · SAC-Gatzke · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Cathy Gatzke
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
N/A
2026-06-05 · SAC-O'Donnell · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-31 · SAC-O'Donnell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Constance Erickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-16 · SAC-O'Donnell · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Molly Odonnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-0, 0-1
L
Heather Graham / Doug Denney
2026-05-08 · SAC-Ko · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jonathan Lo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-26 · SAC-Gatzke · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Constance Erickson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams72 teams · 2016–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.5
48.8%
39W–41L · 49.8% of games
4.0
14.3%
2W–12L · 38.4% of games
7.0
77.8%
14W–4L · 59.7% of games
8.0
28.6%
8W–20L · 42.2% of games
6.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 45.9% of games
7.0mixed
53.1%
26W–23L · 54.3% of games
8.0mixed
25%
4W–12L · 40.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
87 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
68 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
50 matches
#1 Singles
3%
6 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams