← Teams

SAC-Ko

2026 Mixed 55 & Over · 7.0 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 3.46 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.53
Laura Rundle
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.38
Kim Tellin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.37
Timothea Barnatan
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Jihoon Bang
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.30
Sam Ko
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.28
Shawn Boyce
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 22% · published 3.5
3.18
Shari Levelle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.16
Arjun Bilakanti
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Rajan Madhusudan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.02
Jonathan Lo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Grainne Koeberl
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.92
Todd McConachie
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Laura Rundle
113W–113L career
24%76%0%
3.53
3.5
Kim Tellin
110W–71L career
0%97%3%
3.38
3.5
Timothea Barnatan
95W–117L career
0%98%2%
3.37
3.5
Jihoon Bang
57W–41L career
0%99%1%
3.33
3.5
Sam Ko
66W–81L career
0%98%1%
3.30
3.5
Shawn Boyce
170W–125L career
0%99%0%
3.28
3.5
Shari Levelle
63W–57L career
3%97%0%
3.18
3.5
Arjun Bilakanti
47W–107L career
5%95%0%
3.16
3.5
Rajan Madhusudan
94W–79L career
13%87%0%
3.10
3.5
Jonathan Lo
31W–59L career
28%72%0%
3.02
3
Grainne Koeberl
56W–65L career
0%93%7%
2.94
3
Todd McConachie
51W–47L career
0%92%8%
2.92

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.