Search

Jean Herbst

Lake Oswego, OR
4.0A year-end 2025
87 matches · 31W–56L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.39
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
91%
down to 3.5
9%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 68% down · 32% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.46. Higher than today’s 3.39 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lake Oswego · 4.0
46 of 46
OR · 4.0
493 of 498

Jean is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jean has been a steady 4.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Jean has gone from the 82nd to the 43rd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
4.0
41.2%
21W–30L · 45.6% of games
8.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 49.4% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
3W–15L · 36.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history87 matches
W
2026-05-16 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mariko Clark
0.029below expectation — took 47% of games against 60% expected
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Metcalf
+0.042better than expected — took 80% of games against 56% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Lilly
0.041below expectation — took 29% of games against 50% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-02-14 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Loann Wong
0.029below expectation — took 14% of games against 36% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-01-17 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Lilly
+0.004about as expected — took 63% of games against 59% expected
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-01-03 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deana Julka
+0.023better than expected — took 58% of games against 47% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-11-22 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pam Saftler
0.045below expectation — took 14% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 6-0
L
2025-11-09 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heidi Wilcox
0.059below expectation — took 32% of games against 59% expected
7-5, 6-1
W
2025-11-02 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pam Saftler
+0.042better than expected — took 63% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-10-26 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pam Saftler
+0.007about as expected — took 62% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-09-28 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ingeborg Holliday
+0.011about as expected — took 46% of games against 42% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
Kathleen Mannion
2025-06-21 · #2 Singles · 4.0
0.019below expectation — took 29% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.