← Search

Jean Herbst

Lake Oswego, OR
4.0A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
87 matches · 31W–56L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jean Herbst to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history87 matches
W
2026-05-16 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mariko Clark
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-01 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Metcalf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-3
L
2026-04-25 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Lilly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-02-14 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Loann Wong
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-01-17 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elizabeth Lilly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-01-03 · MAC-Brown/Kim · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Deana Julka
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-11-22 · MAC-Lovett/Pickard · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pam Saftler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
L
2025-11-09 · MAC-Lovett/Pickard · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Heidi Wilcox
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 1-6
W
2025-11-02 · MAC-Lovett/Pickard · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pam Saftler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2025-10-26 · MAC-Lovett/Pickard · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Pam Saftler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-3
L
2025-09-28 · MAC-Lovett/Pickard · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ingeborg Holliday
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2025-06-21 · MAC-Herbst · #2 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams19 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
41.2%
21W–30L · 45.6% of games
8.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 49.4% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
3W–15L · 36.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 36% of the time
#3 Doubles
36%
31 matches
#1 Singles
21%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
15%
13 matches
#2 Singles
9%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova