Search

Kana Wakamatsu

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
123 matches · 60W–63L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.45
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
74%
down to 3.5
26%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 48% down · 52% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.50. Higher than today’s 3.45 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.0
255 of 266
OR · 4.0
476 of 498

Kana is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams65 teams · 2011–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Kana has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Kana has gone from the 35th to the 14th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
50%
27W–27L · 52.2% of games
4.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 36% of games
8.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
55%
11W–9L · 52% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history123 matches
W
2026-07-19 · LOTC-Shull · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sheng Saechao
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 48% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · LOTC-Goddard/Rubinshteyn · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edwardeen Hilts
0.091below expectation — took 29% of games against 67% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-05-31 · LOTC-Goddard/Rubinshteyn · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edwardeen Hilts
+0.021better than expected — took 44% of games against 37% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-05-24 · MPRC-Cook/Voravongseng · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Leong
+0.000better than expected — took 80% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-16 · LOTC-Goddard/Rubinshteyn · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Fryman
0.006about as expected — took 38% of games against 42% expected
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-04-05 · MPRC-McNairy/Cronk · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Bolstad
+0.000below expectation — took 53% of games against 61% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-03-21 · MPRC-Cook/Voravongseng · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Leong
+0.000about as expected — took 46% of games against 42% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-31 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Coral Nash
+0.008about as expected — took 29% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-01-30 · SAC-Ingram · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Sullivan
+0.014about as expected — took 35% of games against 34% expected
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-01-11 · SAC-Ingram · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Rundle
0.010about as expected — took 56% of games against 57% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-01-03 · SAC-Ingram · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Rundle
0.023below expectation — took 42% of games against 53% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-01-02 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Teresa Sullivan
+0.028about as expected — took 25% of games against 24% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.