← Search

Kana Wakamatsu

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
124 matches · 61W–63L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Kana Wakamatsu to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history124 matches
W
2026-08-09 · LOTC-Shull · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Damon Ogden mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-19 · LOTC-Shull · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sheng Saechao mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-06 · LOTC-Goddard/Rubinshteyn · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edwardeen Hilts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-31 · LOTC-Goddard/Rubinshteyn · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Edwardeen Hilts
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 5-7
W
2026-05-24 · MPRC-Cook/Voravongseng · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Leong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-05-16 · LOTC-Goddard/Rubinshteyn · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Allison Fryman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-04-05 · MPRC-McNairy/Cronk · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Bolstad mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-21 · MPRC-Cook/Voravongseng · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jason Leong mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-31 · SAC-Nash/Benedict · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Coral Nash
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-30 · SAC-Ingram · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Teresa Sullivan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 1-6
L
2026-01-11 · SAC-Ingram · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Rundle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-01-03 · SAC-Ingram · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Rundle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams65 teams · 2011–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
4.0
50%
27W–27L · 52.2% of games
4.5
23.1%
3W–10L · 36% of games
8.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 56.6% of games
7.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
57.1%
12W–9L · 52.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 36% of the time
#2 Doubles
36%
45 matches
#3 Doubles
35%
43 matches
#1 Doubles
29%
36 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams