Search

Susan Ford

Ridgefield, WA
4.0S year-end 2025
145 matches · 38W–107L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.61
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 15 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
9%
down to 3.5
91%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 6% down · 94% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.62. Higher than today’s 3.61 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.0
540 of 782

Susan is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams91 teams · 2007–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Susan has been a steady 4.0 across all 5 seasons on record.

3.54.020192020202220232026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Susan has gone from the 24th to the 15th percentile of players at that level, 2020 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
25%
7W–21L · 42.9% of games
4.5
0%
0W–5L · 23.1% of games
8.0
31.2%
5W–11L · 44.8% of games
7.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.7% of games
8.0mixed
26.9%
14W–38L · 41.2% of games
9.0mixed
27.8%
10W–26L · 43.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history145 matches
W
2026-07-18 · VTC-Won 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Won
+0.000better than expected — took 59% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
2026-07-17 · WHRC-Lipke · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Berinstein
+0.000better than expected — took 60% of games against 51% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-06-28 · WHRC-Lipke · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Todd Berinstein
+0.000better than expected — took 62% of games against 53% expected
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-06-27 · VTC-Won 8.0 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Won
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-06-21 · VTC-Won 8.0 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Won
+0.000below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-03-22 · SAC-Harwood · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joshua Tran
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-03-14 · SAC-Harwood · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Aaron Hansen
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-02-14 · SAC-Ingram · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenna Hayes
0.011below expectation — took 33% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-01-30 · SAC-Ingram · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Laura Rundle
0.019below expectation — took 14% of games against 33% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-01-17 · SAC-Ingram · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenna Hayes
0.028below expectation — took 50% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-01-11 · SAC-Ingram · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jenna Hayes
+0.001about as expected — took 52% of games against 50% expected
3-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-02 · CGM-Borchers/Rey · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cindy Rushall
0.037below expectation — took 14% of games against 38% expected
6-1, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.