VTC-Olson

2026 Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.46 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

Scouting

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74

Nenette Olson

usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4

3.61

Susan Ford

usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4

3.53

Joanne Reardon

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4

3.41

Cindy Rushall

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 4

3.36

Sharon Loomis-Malin

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.21

Vicki Blunt

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5

3.12

Lynn Hendrix

usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5

3.07

Deborah Self

usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3

3.03

Maryann Velez

usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3

2.88

Teresa Darling

usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3

2.77

Alana Rhea

usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3

—

Michelle Bunje

published 3

Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

Nenette Olson

122W–164L career

1%99%0%

3.74

Susan Ford

38W–107L career · type S

12%88%0%

3.61

Joanne Reardon

32W–33L career · type A

33%67%0%

3.53

Cindy Rushall

100W–170L career

60%40%0%

3.41

3.5

Sharon Loomis-Malin

60W–33L career

0%97%3%

3.36

3.5

Vicki Blunt

89W–109L career

2%98%0%

3.21

3.5

Lynn Hendrix

56W–47L career

12%88%0%

3.12

Deborah Self

105W–99L career

0%62%38%

3.07

Maryann Velez

81W–49L career

0%74%26%

3.03

Teresa Darling

122W–102L career

0%97%3%

2.88

Alana Rhea

77W–88L career

0%99%0%

2.77

Michelle Bunje

15W–19L career

not enough data

—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.