← Search

Angie Stromquist

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
160 matches · 105W–55L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Angie Stromquist to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history160 matches
W
2026-08-09 · GLVR-Kopack · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Jung mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-08-08 · GLVR-Kopack · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Jung mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-08-07 · GLVR-Kopack · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Michael Jung mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-07-11 · GLVR-Kopack · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Brad Ouderkirk mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Leah Buxman championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cate Harrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 0-1
W
2026-05-31 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cate Harrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-16 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cate Harrington
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
L
2026-04-19 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Farrelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 2-6
W
2026-03-28 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Tina Farrelly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-1
L
2026-02-21 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Whitney Palfreyman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-02-14 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Keely Kopetz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams39 teams · 2019–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
75%
15W–5L · 60.3% of games
3.5
64.4%
29W–16L · 56.7% of games
4.0
58.1%
25W–18L · 54% of games
6.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 39.2% of games
7.0mixed
84.6%
11W–2L · 57.7% of games
8.0mixed
72.7%
8W–3L · 60.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
71 matches
#2 Doubles
40%
64 matches
#3 Doubles
15%
24 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova