Search

Trish Vawter

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
146 matches · 63W–83L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.73
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 25 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
100%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the middle of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Portland · 4.0
108 of 266
OR · 4.0
205 of 498

Trish is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Teams68 teams · 2011–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Trish has played at 4.5, 4.0 across 8 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

3.54.04.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 8.0, Trish has gone from the 86th to the 20th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 56.3% of games
4.5
40.7%
37W–54L · 47.5% of games
8.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 52.8% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.4% of games
9.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 37% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history146 matches
L
2026-06-21 · NOR-IRV-Lyon · #2 Doubles · with Antoinette Ann Reno
+0.001about as expected — took 46% of games against 45% expected
7-6, 7-6
W
2026-06-20 · NOR-IRV-Lyon · #3 Doubles · with Antoinette Ann Reno
+0.029better than expected — took 67% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · NOR-IRV-Lyon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Antoinette Ann Reno
+0.017better than expected — took 59% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-06 · NOR-IRV-Lyon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Antoinette Ann Reno
+0.007better than expected — took 63% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-17 · IRV-Strange · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Keith Johnson
+0.000below expectation — took 37% of games against 56% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-05-17 · NOR-IRV-Lyon · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.046below expectation — took 37% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-05-16 · IRV-Strange · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Eggerts
+0.000about as expected — took 57% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-05-02 · IRV-Strange · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Ringelberg
+0.000below expectation — took 41% of games against 51% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-04-25 · NOR-IRV-Lyon · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.006below expectation — took 35% of games against 41% expected
6-2, 7-5
W
2026-04-18 · NOR-IRV-Lyon · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.049below expectation — took 57% of games against 72% expected
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-03-27 · IRV-Strange · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Keith Johnson
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 39% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
Melanie Wong
2026-03-21 · IRV-Lyon/Towle · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.011about as expected — took 55% of games against 59% expected
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.