← Search

Trish Vawter

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
149 matches · 64W–85L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Trish Vawter to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history149 matches
L
2026-08-08 · #1 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-08 · #3 Doubles · with Cathy Porter championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Antoinette Ann Reno championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-21 · #2 Doubles · with Antoinette Ann Reno championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-7
W
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Antoinette Ann Reno championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-06-14 · NOR-IRV-Lyon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Antoinette Ann Reno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
W
2026-06-06 · NOR-IRV-Lyon · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Antoinette Ann Reno
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-05-17 · IRV-Strange · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Keith Johnson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-17 · NOR-IRV-Lyon · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-16 · IRV-Strange · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Steve Eggerts mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-05-02 · IRV-Strange · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with James Ringelberg mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-25 · NOR-IRV-Lyon · #1 Singles · 4.0
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams68 teams · 2011–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 56.3% of games
4.5
40.7%
37W–54L · 47.5% of games
8.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 52.8% of games
9.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 47.4% of games
9.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 37% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 26% of the time
#1 Singles
26%
39 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
31 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
31 matches
#2 Singles
8%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer