← Search

Leah Buxman

Portland, OR
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
219 matches · 113W–106L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Leah Buxman to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history219 matches
L
2026-07-22 · Me and My Bestie · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Claire Tirapelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-12 · Me and My Bestie · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Claire Tirapelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-6
L
2026-06-27 · Me and My Bestie · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Claire Tirapelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-26 · Me and My Bestie · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Claire Tirapelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-24 · Me and My Bestie · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Claire Tirapelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Angie Stromquist championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-16 · Me and My Bestie · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Claire Tirapelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 0-6
L
2026-06-14 · Me and My Bestie · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Claire Tirapelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-13 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Whitney Palfreyman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-10 · Me and My Bestie · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Claire Tirapelle
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 4-6
L
2026-05-16 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Whitney Palfreyman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-04-24 · GLVR-Buxman/Stromquist · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Whitney Palfreyman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams47 teams · 2018–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
0.0
20%
2W–8L · 38.7% of games
3.0
50%
2W–2L · 52.7% of games
3.5
75%
21W–7L · 59.6% of games
4.0
50%
43W–43L · 49.5% of games
4.5
14.3%
3W–18L · 35.7% of games
7.0mixed
63.6%
14W–8L · 54.9% of games
8.0mixed
61.5%
8W–5L · 51.1% of games
9.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 55.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 62% of the time
#1 Doubles
62%
136 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
41 matches
#3 Doubles
16%
35 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#1 Singles
1%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe