← Search

Sydney Bloch

Kirkland, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
200 matches · 139W–61L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.97
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 42 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.5
63%
stay 4.0
37%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 90% stay · 10% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.90. Lower than today’s 3.97 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Kirkland · 4.0
1 of 32
WA · 4.0
23 of 782

Sydney is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sydney has played at 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 across 7 seasons — 3 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.54.04.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Sydney has gone from the 40th to the 92nd percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
0.0
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 65.4% of games
3.5
80%
28W–7L · 64.2% of games
4.0
73.6%
39W–14L · 60.4% of games
4.5
48.3%
14W–15L · 48% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 64.7% of games
7.0mixed
85%
17W–3L · 61.8% of games
8.0mixed
56.2%
9W–7L · 53.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history200 matches
L
Kimberly Aigner / Eryn Muetzel
2026-07-29 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Megan Huffman
+0.021better than expected — took 50% of games against 40% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Megan Huffman
−0.010about as expected — took 71% of games against 68% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah Chamberlain
+0.002better than expected — took 75% of games against 67% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emilee Plank
−0.039below expectation — took 41% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 7-6
L
Ellen Mader / Emily Hagelgans
2026-07-11 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emilee Plank
−0.014below expectation — took 40% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelli Corbett
+0.004better than expected — took 71% of games against 63% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-08 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Megan Huffman
+0.039better than expected — took 86% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kelli Corbett
+0.005better than expected — took 75% of games against 66% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
Yimeng Song / Ruofei Shuang
2026-06-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Megan Huffman
−0.028below expectation — took 42% of games against 55% expected
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-20 · #2 Doubles · with Emilee Plank
+0.030better than expected — took 57% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-06-12 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kate Oost
−0.010about as expected — took 67% of games against 66% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-06-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Emilee Plank
+0.017better than expected — took 46% of games against 39% expected
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.