← Search

Sydney Bloch

Kirkland, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
223 matches · 153W–70L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Sydney Bloch to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history223 matches
L
2026-09-12 · BC-Bloch & Blue · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jordan Bluehdorn mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6
L
Kristine Hanover / Kathryn Hagstrom
2026-08-16 · #1 Doubles · with Erin Hostetler championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-15 · #1 Doubles · with Erin Hostetler championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-08-13 · #1 Doubles · with Erin Hostetler championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-08-09 · #1 Doubles · with Grace Bethards championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-08 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-07 · #2 Singles championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-07 · #3 Doubles · with Emilee Plank championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-05 · Bloch · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Megan Huffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
W
2026-08-04 · AMG Petronas · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Hostetler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-3
W
2026-07-31 · Bloch · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Megan Huffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-07-29 · Bloch · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Megan Huffman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams42 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
88.9%
8W–1L · 65.4% of games
3.5
78.6%
22W–6L · 64.9% of games
4.0
73.7%
28W–10L · 60.4% of games
4.5
42.9%
12W–16L · 47.7% of games
0.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
70%
7W–3L · 54.8% of games
4.0mixed
80%
16W–4L · 62.4% of games
4.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
66.7%
6W–3L · 63.1% of games
7.0mixed
85%
17W–3L · 61.8% of games
8.0mixed
52.9%
9W–8L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
99 matches
#3 Doubles
12%
26 matches
#1 Female Doubles
11%
25 matches
#1 Singles
10%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
10%
22 matches
#2 Singles
6%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams