Teams

NOR-VTC-Mikalatos

2026 Adult 18 & Over · 4.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.44 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.25
Andrea Cunningham
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.23
Lauren Skelly
usually #1 Singles 78%, also #2 Doubles 11% · published 4.5
4.19
Rebecca Yu
usually #2 Singles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.02
Emilee Plank
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 4.5
4.02
Shannon Fraser
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.99
Heidi Affentranger
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.92
Kaytlynn Kolb
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.84
Halle Jackson
usually #1 Doubles 27%, also #1 Female Doubles 27% · published 4
3.83
Krista Mikalatos
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4.5
Andrea Cunningham
47W–26L career
0%98%1%
4.25
4.5
Lauren Skelly
68W–37L career
0%99%1%
4.23
4.5
Rebecca Yu
64W–49L career
1%99%0%
4.19
4.5
Emilee Plank
74W–48L career
10%90%0%
4.02
4.5
Shannon Fraser
154W–62L career
14%86%0%
4.02
4.5
Heidi Affentranger
78W–81L career
19%81%0%
3.99
4.5
Kaytlynn Kolb
70W–38L career
32%68%0%
3.92
4
Halle Jackson
122W–58L career
0%99%1%
3.84
4.5
Krista Mikalatos
113W–80L career
58%42%0%
3.83

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.