Search

Margaret Zheng

Lynnwood, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
158 matches · 80W–78L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.61
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 27 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
8%
down to 3.5
92%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 5% down · 95% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.63. Higher than today’s 3.61 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Lynnwood · 4.0
6 of 8
WA · 4.0
531 of 782

Margaret is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Margaret has played at 4.0, 4.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 1 down.

3.54.04.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Margaret has gone from the 75th to the 82nd percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
73.3%
22W–8L · 57.2% of games
4.5
45.2%
28W–34L · 47.3% of games
7.0mixed
40%
4W–6L · 48.3% of games
8.0mixed
50%
15W–15L · 52.1% of games
9.0mixed
41.2%
7W–10L · 44.2% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history158 matches
W
James Milton Smith / Christina Mertenmixed
2026-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jagbir Singh
+0.000better than expected — took 75% of games against 57% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Zhao
+0.000below expectation — took 28% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 7-5
L
2026-07-18 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shana Curran
0.036below expectation — took 25% of games against 45% expected
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jagbir Singh
+0.000better than expected — took 50% of games against 37% expected
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Stark
0.043below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Stark
+0.028better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Stark
+0.002about as expected — took 63% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
Nina Menon / Ruth Sheehan
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Katie Stark
+0.004better than expected — took 67% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-05 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jagbir Singh
+0.000better than expected — took 71% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-05 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with David Zhao
+0.000about as expected — took 41% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 7-5
W
N/A
2026-07-03 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shana Curran
0.079about as expected — took 100% of games against 96% expected
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-06-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Shana Curran
+0.002about as expected — took 57% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.