Search

Katie Stark

Mill Creek, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
133 matches · 84W–49L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.68
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 21 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
1%
down to 3.5
99%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the lower half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
WA · 4.0
388 of 782

Katie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Katie has been a steady 4.0 across all 8 seasons on record.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Katie has gone from the 68th to the 68th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
4.0
66.3%
57W–29L · 56% of games
4.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
72.2%
26W–10L · 59% of games
9.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history133 matches
W
Benjamin Tudor / Pam MacDuffmixed
2026-07-18 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wolf Yeigh
+0.000below expectation — took 67% of games against 72% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Zheng
0.043below expectation — took 29% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-07-14 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Zheng
+0.028better than expected — took 80% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-1
W
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Zheng
+0.002about as expected — took 63% of games against 59% expected
6-0, 3-6, 1-0
W
Nina Menon / Ruth Sheehan
2026-07-09 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Zheng
+0.004better than expected — took 67% of games against 61% expected
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-28 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Wolf Yeigh
+0.000about as expected — took 63% of games against 60% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Margaret Zheng
+0.018better than expected — took 63% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-13 · #3 Doubles · with Chenoa Haluptzok
0.035below expectation — took 38% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Chenoa Haluptzok
+0.011about as expected — took 56% of games against 51% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Lang
+0.007better than expected — took 71% of games against 62% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-08 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Archana Kumar
0.034below expectation — took 44% of games against 58% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Lang
0.003about as expected — took 41% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.