Search

Sarah Robinson

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
90 matches · 42W–48L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.54.04.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.51
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 9 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
43%
down to 3.5
57%
stay 4.0
0%
up to 4.5
Projected to December: 25% down · 75% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.55. Higher than today’s 3.51 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 4.0 runs from 3.51 to 4.00. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 4.0
163 of 186
WA · 4.0
700 of 782

Sarah is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Sarah has been 4.0 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.54.020192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Sarah has gone from the 64th to the 21st percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
4.0
59.3%
35W–24L · 51.6% of games
4.5
0%
0W–5L · 27.4% of games
8.0
41.2%
7W–10L · 50.8% of games
9.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history90 matches
L
2026-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mary Seifred
0.033below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sarah McKinney
0.007below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-03 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Satterwhite
+0.001about as expected — took 55% of games against 54% expected
7-5, 5-5
W
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Willemijn de Clercq
0.012below expectation — took 52% of games against 58% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Cat Zhang / Fiona Lo
2026-01-31 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Lea
+0.007about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-01-04 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Lea
+0.042better than expected — took 50% of games against 36% expected
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W
2025-11-15 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Karen Sheppard
0.011below expectation — took 45% of games against 52% expected
7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L
2025-11-07 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Willemijn de Clercq
0.002about as expected — took 45% of games against 46% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-10-04 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Martha Moseley
0.022below expectation — took 45% of games against 54% expected
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2025-08-07 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Dana Satterwhite
0.061below expectation — took 20% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-08-06 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Erin Lea
0.041below expectation — took 39% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 4-2
L
2025-07-26 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Bouscaren
0.015below expectation — took 14% of games against 32% expected
6-2, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.