← Search

Monica Fliflet

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
63 matches · 42W–21L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Monica Fliflet to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history63 matches
W
2026-05-22 · TCSP-Bursiek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Pavelich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-05-15 · TCSP-Bursiek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Blake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-05-08 · TCSP-Bursiek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nicole Janson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-05-01 · TCSP-Bursiek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Blake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-04-17 · TCSP-Bursiek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Amy Pavelich
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-03-14 · NTC-Hits Different-Bursiek · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Carr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 0-1
L
2026-01-31 · NTC-Hits Different-Bursiek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Blake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-01-18 · NTC-Hits Different-Bursiek · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Rachel Blake
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 5-7
W
2025-08-24 · #2 Doubles · with Rachel Blake championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-08-23 · #2 Doubles · with Rachel Blake championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-2
W
2025-08-22 · #2 Doubles · with Rachel Blake championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-06-08 · #2 Doubles · with Rachel Blake championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
68.8%
33W–15L · 58.7% of games
4.0
62.5%
5W–3L · 55.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 41% of the time
#1 Doubles
41%
26 matches
#2 Doubles
35%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert