← Search

Treasa Sweek

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 96W–54L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Treasa Sweek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
L
2026-08-19 · Sweek · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
W
2026-07-29 · Sweek · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-26 · TCSP-Green as an Apple-Petzel · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mike Mullen mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-07-11 · TCSP-Green as an Apple-Petzel · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Huai-Ping Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-03 · TCSP-Green as an Apple-Petzel · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Huai-Ping Lee mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 6-7
L
2026-06-07 · TCSP-Racket Science-Benson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daisy Cullop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-05-30 · TCSP-Racket Science-Benson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Mansfield
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-19 · Petzel - 3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-05-17 · TCSP-Racket Science-Benson · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Yuko Kitsis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W
2026-05-12 · Petzel - 3.5 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-4
W
2026-05-10 · TCSP-Racket Science-Benson · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Daisy Cullop
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
W
2026-05-09 · TCSP-Racket Science-Benson · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Corey Golden
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
68.8%
33W–15L · 57.6% of games
3.5
50%
27W–27L · 48.5% of games
6.0mixed
88.2%
15W–2L · 64.9% of games
7.0mixed
73.3%
11W–4L · 56.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 28% of the time
#1 Doubles
28%
42 matches
#1 Singles
28%
42 matches
#2 Doubles
17%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
17%
25 matches
#2 Singles
10%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal