Search

Emily Perkins

Seattle, WA
3.5S year-end 2024
14 matches · 3W–11L · seasons 20252026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.03
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 12 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
38%
down to 3.0
62%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 22% down · 78% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.06. Higher than today’s 3.03 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
376 of 396
WA · 3.5
1554 of 1624

Emily is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
0.0
50%
2W–2L · 47.4% of games
3.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 39.2% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history14 matches
W
ZIYANG ZHANG
2026-07-28 · #1 Female Singles · 0.0
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4
L
Jing Peng
2026-07-21 · #1 Female Singles · 0.0
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3
W
2026-07-14 · #1 Female Singles · 0.0
0.093below expectation — took 60% of games against 91% expected
6-4
L
2026-07-07 · #1 Female Doubles · 0.0 · with Megan Sng
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3
L
2026-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Zimbelman
0.009below expectation — took 38% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-06-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Leah Allen
+0.040better than expected — took 38% of games against 28% expected
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-05-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Zimbelman
+0.008about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
2026-05-15 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Amy Zimbelman
+0.016better than expected — took 46% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeng Tcheung
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lori Clithero
+0.010about as expected — took 44% of games against 41% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Chardie Byrne
0.007below expectation — took 29% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Meisner
0.030below expectation — took 44% of games against 59% expected
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.