Search

Anna Hundt

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
101 matches · 63W–38L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.40
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
90%
stay 3.5
10%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 98% stay · 2% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.34. Lower than today’s 3.40 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
66 of 256
WA · 3.5
290 of 1209

Anna is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Anna has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Anna has gone from the 78th to the 79th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
69.6%
32W–14L · 56.1% of games
3.5
66.7%
20W–10L · 55.4% of games
7.0
40%
2W–3L · 57.3% of games
6.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 55.6% of games
7.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 46.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history101 matches
W
Courtney Williams / Lara Wagner
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Wilson
+0.046better than expected — took 71% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-07-24 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nicholas Maddock
+0.000about as expected — took 52% of games against 53% expected
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-20 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Catherine Wilson
0.019below expectation — took 48% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-03 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ben Perkowski
+0.000better than expected — took 48% of games against 40% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
Nichole Ikeda / Ali Jones
2026-07-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with DeeDee Schubert
+0.007about as expected — took 59% of games against 55% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-06-12 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ben Perkowski
+0.000below expectation — took 20% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-0
W
Amy Zimbelman / Emily Perkins
2026-06-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Dawn Apacible
+0.006about as expected — took 62% of games against 58% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Rena Behar / Sarah Zuberec
2026-05-28 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Larsen
+0.025better than expected — took 71% of games against 56% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-22 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Larsen
0.025below expectation — took 50% of games against 61% expected
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Erin Coomer / Mary Fitzgerald
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mikhaila Reudink
+0.027better than expected — took 58% of games against 46% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shirley Chow
0.059below expectation — took 25% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Julita Eleveld / Tory Frol
2026-04-16 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Debbie Larsen
+0.053better than expected — took 80% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.