Search

Mary Fitzgerald

Bellevue, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
40 matches · 18W–22L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.32
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 11 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
99%
stay 3.5
1%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Bellevue · 3.5
46 of 119
WA · 3.5
546 of 1460

Mary is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Mary has been a steady 3.5 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920212022202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021, 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Mary has gone from the 6th to the 66th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
51.7%
15W–14L · 50.9% of games
4.0
30%
3W–7L · 37.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history40 matches
L
2026-06-20 · #1 Doubles · with Celia Evans
+0.006about as expected — took 29% of games against 33% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erin Coomer
0.018below expectation — took 42% of games against 51% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-07 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with J Weed
0.006about as expected — took 53% of games against 53% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Carol Guattare / Joanna Hennessy
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Misiewicz
0.009about as expected — took 67% of games against 65% expected
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Melissa Jones
+0.029better than expected — took 57% of games against 44% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-02-27 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Corr
0.042below expectation — took 25% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-3
W
2026-02-20 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Misiewicz
+0.034better than expected — took 63% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-02-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julie Blume
+0.063better than expected — took 59% of games against 35% expected
6-4, 7-5
L
Kristina Dirks / Angie Harwood
2026-01-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Blume
0.026below expectation — took 46% of games against 57% expected
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
W
Jodi Dansereau / Joan Harkins
2026-01-11 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie Misiewicz
+0.034better than expected — took 63% of games against 47% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Alexandra Ryan / Hejin Yim
2026-01-10 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Martha Hesch
0.028below expectation — took 29% of games against 45% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2025-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Alexa Helsell McIntyre
0.016below expectation — took 40% of games against 48% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.