← Search

Katie Jergens

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
212 matches · 132W–80L · seasons 2019–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.42
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 28 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
83%
stay 3.5
17%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 96% stay · 4% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.36. Lower than today’s 3.42 because form regresses — players this far into their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
48 of 256
WA · 3.5
227 of 1209

Katie is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Katie has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 7 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.52019202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Katie has gone from the 80th to the 69th percentile of players at that level, 2021 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.0
88.1%
37W–5L · 64.1% of games
3.5
61.8%
42W–26L · 53.7% of games
4.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 44.2% of games
6.0
85.7%
6W–1L · 65% of games
7.0
61.1%
11W–7L · 55.7% of games
8.0
66.7%
8W–4L · 54.9% of games
6.0mixed
52.4%
11W–10L · 52.5% of games
7.0mixed
20%
2W–8L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history212 matches
W
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Shyla Summers
+0.021better than expected — took 63% of games against 52% expected
6-4, 6-3
L
AliceJane Brush / Molly Scott
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stella Withey
−0.041below expectation — took 41% of games against 59% expected
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-05-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hien Nguyen
−0.011about as expected — took 71% of games against 68% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-22 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Zakahi
+0.073better than expected — took 92% of games against 52% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
Kelly Medzegian / Cameron Ferguson
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hien Nguyen
−0.050below expectation — took 29% of games against 54% expected
6-1, 6-4
W
2026-05-10 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kazue Wickens
−0.004about as expected — took 50% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
Jingjing Cai / Amy Hsu
2026-05-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kazue Wickens
+0.000about as expected — took 50% of games against 51% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-19 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Stella Withey
−0.018below expectation — took 40% of games against 49% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2026-04-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Zakahi
+0.012better than expected — took 57% of games against 51% expected
1-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
Mallica Sikka / Tessa Chen
2026-04-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Zakahi
−0.002about as expected — took 56% of games against 56% expected
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tina Zakahi
+0.004better than expected — took 67% of games against 61% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
2026-03-08 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Julia Pollock
+0.011about as expected — took 50% of games against 47% expected
6-2, 1-6, 1-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.