← Search

Erica Lerer

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 39W–47L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Erica Lerer to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history86 matches
W
2026-08-09 · TCSP-Lampitt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Evan Lerer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-07-10 · TCSP-Lampitt · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Evan Lerer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-28 · TCSP-Lampitt · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Evan Lerer mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-22 · TCSP-Holland · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Mullin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-2, 0-1
W
2026-05-21 · TCSP-Holland · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 5-3
W
2026-04-24 · TCSP-Holland · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hanseler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
W
2026-04-23 · TCSP-Holland · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-04-16 · TCSP-Holland · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-04-03 · TCSP-Holland · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Lee
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-26 · TCSP-Holland · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-03-14 · NTC-Slice Cream Sundaes-Gatcheco · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Spencer-Snyder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-02-21 · NTC-Slice Cream Sundaes-Gatcheco · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Holland
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
2.5
50%
2W–2L · 51.2% of games
3.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 52.3% of games
3.5
44.1%
15W–19L · 48.5% of games
6.0mixed
44.4%
8W–10L · 49.8% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
2W–10L · 42.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 48% of the time
#1 Doubles
48%
41 matches
#1 Singles
28%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
16%
14 matches
#3 Doubles
6%
5 matches
#2 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe