Search

Erica Lerer

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
81 matches · 36W–45L · seasons 20202026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.34
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 18 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
2%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
100 of 256
WA · 3.5
437 of 1209

Erica is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Erica has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Erica has gone from the 21st to the 62nd percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
66.7%
12W–6L · 52.3% of games
3.5
44.1%
15W–19L · 48.5% of games
6.0mixed
44.4%
8W–10L · 49.8% of games
7.0mixed
9.1%
1W–10L · 41.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history81 matches
L
Laura Borner / Timur Sadykovmixed
2026-07-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Evan Lerer
+0.000about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-28 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Evan Lerer
+0.000below expectation — took 25% of games against 48% expected
6-0, 6-4
L
2026-05-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Beth Mullin
+0.002about as expected — took 55% of games against 51% expected
7-6, 2-6, 1-0
W
Annika Andrews
2026-05-21 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.009about as expected — took 61% of games against 62% expected
6-4, 5-3
W
Amy Enns-Ford / Erica Wiechers
2026-04-24 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hanseler
+0.043better than expected — took 63% of games against 43% expected
6-4, 6-3
W
Marell Morel
2026-04-23 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.014better than expected — took 71% of games against 60% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Sharon Wang
2026-04-16 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.018better than expected — took 62% of games against 53% expected
7-6, 6-2
W
Jennie Cecil-Moore / Waid Louie
2026-04-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sharon Lee
+0.022better than expected — took 80% of games against 63% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-03-26 · #1 Singles · 3.5
+0.026better than expected — took 47% of games against 37% expected
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Spencer-Snyder
0.004below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-02-21 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Holland
0.002about as expected — took 43% of games against 44% expected
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Kelly Thompson / Anne Diaw
2026-02-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Spencer-Snyder
+0.092better than expected — took 80% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.