Search

Helen Spencer-Snyder

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
81 matches · 36W–45L · seasons 20212026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.07
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
18%
down to 3.0
82%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 11% down · 89% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.10. Higher than today’s 3.07 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
249 of 256
WA · 3.5
1145 of 1209

Helen is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Helen has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 6 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.5202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Helen has gone from the 41st to the 19th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level4 levels played
3.0
50%
14W–14L · 51.5% of games
3.5
28.6%
8W–20L · 42.9% of games
6.0
66.7%
4W–2L · 51.8% of games
7.0
40%
4W–6L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history81 matches
L
2026-06-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Minda Brusse
0.022below expectation — took 8% of games against 30% expected
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liesl Langley
+0.003about as expected — took 43% of games against 43% expected
7-6, 6-4
L
Rebecca Whitlock / Melissa Fink
2026-04-24 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Holt
0.009about as expected — took 53% of games against 54% expected
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Sandy Margoles / Angelyn Regala
2026-04-23 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevyn Hauser
0.045below expectation — took 29% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-04-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Holt
0.004about as expected — took 39% of games against 42% expected
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Carol LaMoria / Jane Lee
2026-04-03 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kevyn Hauser
+0.010better than expected — took 59% of games against 54% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Amanda Weaver / Aki Carroll
2026-03-26 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Liesl Langley
+0.044better than expected — took 60% of games against 41% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-03-14 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica Lerer
0.004below expectation — took 33% of games against 39% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-02-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Saddler
0.018below expectation — took 14% of games against 32% expected
6-0, 6-2
W
Kelly Thompson / Anne Diaw
2026-02-13 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erica Lerer
+0.092better than expected — took 80% of games against 37% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-01-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anne Holland
+0.010about as expected — took 41% of games against 39% expected
7-6, 6-3
L
2025-10-11 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kevyn Hauser
0.010below expectation — took 35% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 7-6
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.