← Search

Jane Saddler

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 70W–65L · seasons 2019–2027

Captains: add Jane Saddler to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
W
2026-09-12 · NTC-Dream Team-Gilbert · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jenny Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-02 · TCSP-Alley-Oops! Tameling · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aki Tameling
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
L
2026-05-28 · TCSP-Holland · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennifer Hanseler
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-21 · TCSP-Holland · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Caren Gillespie
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-05-19 · TCSP-Alley-Oops! Tameling · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Donna Lou
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-05-06 · TCSP-Alley-Oops! Tameling · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jenny Sanders
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-24 · TCSP-Holland · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Minda Brusse
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-23 · TCSP-Holland · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Holt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-04-16 · TCSP-Holland · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Susan Holt
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-04-03 · TCSP-Holland · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mary Balmaceda
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-02-21 · NTC-Slice Cream Sundaes-Gatcheco · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Helen Spencer-Snyder
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 2-6
W
2026-01-30 · NTC-Slice Cream Sundaes-Gatcheco · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Suanty Kaghan
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams27 teams · 2021–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.0
55.8%
29W–23L · 53.5% of games
3.5
29.3%
12W–29L · 42% of games
6.0
78.6%
11W–3L · 58.3% of games
7.0
50%
2W–2L · 45.5% of games
6.0mixed
64.3%
9W–5L · 52.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
51 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
46 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
34 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer