Search

Eda Topur

Seattle, WA
3.0C year-end 2025
90 matches · 54W–36L · seasons 20232026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

2.83
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 14 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
98%
stay 3.0
2%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.0
166 of 252
WA · 3.0
691 of 1107

Eda is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Eda has been a steady 3.0 across all 4 seasons on record.

2.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Eda has gone from the 31st to the 19th percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.0
61.8%
34W–21L · 55.6% of games
3.5
33.3%
5W–10L · 46.9% of games
6.0
88.2%
15W–2L · 59% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history90 matches
L
Ge Wang
2026-06-03 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.006below expectation — took 29% of games against 37% expected
6-1, 6-4
L
Jennifer Song
2026-05-20 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.026below expectation — took 43% of games against 55% expected
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Erzsebet Van Mieghem
2026-05-13 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.023better than expected — took 71% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-04-22 · #2 Singles · 3.0
0.020below expectation — took 33% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-2
W
Laura Naden
2026-03-31 · #1 Singles · 3.0
+0.008better than expected — took 63% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-4
L
Erin Kirkpatrick
2026-03-07 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.011below expectation — took 29% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-02-28 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.043below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-0, 6-3
L
Dana Feder
2026-02-08 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.077below expectation — took 20% of games against 58% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Kathryn Soligon
2026-02-01 · #1 Singles · 3.0
0.025about as expected — took 68% of games against 71% expected
6-1, 7-5
W
Leona Zamora / Lisa Sowder
2025-11-08 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with April Ancinas
0.011about as expected — took 65% of games against 65% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-10-19 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Jane Stonecipher
0.032below expectation — took 50% of games against 61% expected
7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W
2025-10-05 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Karen Beaudry
+0.021better than expected — took 67% of games against 55% expected
6-4, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.