Search

Irene Reguera

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
47 matches · 14W–33L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.10
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 7 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
11%
down to 3.0
89%
stay 3.5
0%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 7% down · 93% stay · 0% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.12. Higher than today’s 3.10 because players this far below their band have historically finished nearer the middle of it.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the bottom of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
240 of 256
WA · 3.5
1108 of 1209

Irene is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Irene has been a steady 3.5 across all 6 seasons on record.

3.03.5201920222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Irene has gone from the 29th to the 13th percentile of players at that level, 2025 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level3 levels played
3.5
34.6%
9W–17L · 44.4% of games
7.0
36.4%
4W–7L · 42.7% of games
7.0mixed
10%
1W–9L · 39.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history47 matches
L
Sandy Margoles / Lindsay Swanson
2026-06-04 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jane Lee
0.030below expectation — took 25% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-2
L
Nicolle Sherwood / Tina Sypher
2026-05-14 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tien Cheng
0.033below expectation — took 25% of games against 44% expected
6-4, 6-0
L
Jill Hancock / Jennifer Johnson
2026-05-01 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennie Cecil-Moore
+0.007about as expected — took 48% of games against 44% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
Andrea Lang / Suchita Thakur
2026-04-17 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Salena Wang
+0.006about as expected — took 41% of games against 40% expected
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
Jane Saddler / Mary Balmaceda
2026-04-03 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Salena Wang
+0.037better than expected — took 59% of games against 43% expected
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
L
2025-10-17 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Bouscaren
+0.011about as expected — took 35% of games against 35% expected
4-6, 6-0, 1-0
L
2025-09-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Celia Evans
0.017below expectation — took 35% of games against 44% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-05-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jenny Cho
+0.001about as expected — took 41% of games against 42% expected
7-6, 6-3
W
Holly Norris / Jennifer Livingston
2025-05-15 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rene Yoshizawa
+0.046better than expected — took 52% of games against 36% expected
7-6, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-04-25 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Evelyn Wolfe
0.024below expectation — took 35% of games against 48% expected
7-5, 6-2
L
Helen Spencer-Snyder / Aki Carroll
2025-03-27 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jennie Cecil-Moore
0.012below expectation — took 42% of games against 48% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-03-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Melissa Clark
0.011below expectation — took 40% of games against 46% expected
6-4, 6-4
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.