Search

Melissa Clark

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
31 matches · 12W–19L · seasons 20192026
Where Melissa sits
145
2.5
1349
3.0
1627
3.5
1052
4.0
435
4.5
70
5.0

Melissa is one of 1627 women at 3.5 in this cohort of 4678. Levels at or below 3.5 account for 67% of them. Shown for women only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Melissa has been 3.5 for all 6 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.5201920212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2021, 2022, 2024 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Melissa has gone from the 29th to the 30th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2023.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
48%
12W–13L · 46.7% of games
7.0
0%
0W–6L · 36% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history31 matches
L
2025-10-17 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with J Weed
0.033below expectation — took 42% of games against 57% expected
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L
2025-09-07 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mary Battison
+0.003about as expected — took 40% of games against 41% expected
6-1, 5-7, 1-0
L
2025-03-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Irene Reguera
0.001about as expected — took 40% of games against 42% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2025-02-02 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Blume
0.021below expectation — took 59% of games against 65% expected
6-2, 6-7, 1-0
L
2025-01-04 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Blume
+0.016better than expected — took 48% of games against 41% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2024-11-10 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Irene Reguera
0.027below expectation — took 20% of games against 38% expected
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-09-22 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Blume
0.042below expectation — took 40% of games against 58% expected
6-4, 6-4
W
2024-02-03 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Julie Blume
+0.037better than expected — took 56% of games against 41% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
2024-01-21 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Whitfield
0.029below expectation — took 25% of games against 42% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
2023-11-04 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Blume
0.014below expectation — took 40% of games against 47% expected
6-4, 6-4
L
2023-09-10 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kathleen Perkins
0.047below expectation — took 29% of games against 53% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2023-08-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kristen Lamey
0.020below expectation — took 25% of games against 39% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.