Search

Trisna Tanus

Seattle, WA
3.5C year-end 2025
93 matches · 61W–32L · seasons 20192026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh

Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely. The dashed lines are the band edges, and the three shaded areas are the three percentages below.

3.34
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 16 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
2%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure — scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. Graded publicly in December when USTA publishes year-end ratings. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model.

Where you rank
Seattle · 3.5
106 of 256
WA · 3.5
452 of 1209

Trisna is ranked among players at the same level in the same place, by our estimated dynamic rating — not the published level, which is the same for everyone in the band. Groups smaller than five are not ranked, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Trisna has been 3.5 for all 8 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the top.

3.03.520192020202120222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Trisna has gone from the 36th to the 52nd percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
67.1%
55W–27L · 55.5% of games
7.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 54.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history93 matches
L
Jennifer Howe / Kelly Thompson
2026-07-13 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Toby Miller
+0.019better than expected — took 48% of games against 40% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Tammy Chu / Nita Khandelwal
2026-05-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Raub
+0.025better than expected — took 67% of games against 54% expected
6-4, 6-2
L
Yan Hong / Alexis Chen
2026-05-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Darci Wyman
0.014below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Alison Winfield / Rachel Stroble
2026-05-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Vecchio
+0.022better than expected — took 62% of games against 51% expected
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L
Amy McCullough / Molly Scott
2026-05-09 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Raub
0.023below expectation — took 29% of games against 43% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
Leslie Vigil
2026-04-25 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.029better than expected — took 86% of games against 64% expected
6-2, 6-0
W
Isha Handa
2026-04-17 · #2 Singles · 3.5
+0.007about as expected — took 56% of games against 52% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-28 · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.026about as expected — took 71% of games against 73% expected
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-03-01 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diana Vecchio
0.009about as expected — took 56% of games against 59% expected
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-02-21 · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Toby Miller
+0.036better than expected — took 67% of games against 49% expected
6-2, 6-4
L
Noelani da Silva
2026-02-15 · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.029below expectation — took 33% of games against 48% expected
6-3, 6-3
L
Tammi Walker / Lena Peter
2026-01-31 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Danielle Raub
0.037below expectation — took 39% of games against 56% expected
6-7, 5-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.